Outcomes of Arthroscopic Latarjet as a Revision Surgery After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.

BACKGROUND: The role of arthroscopic Latarjet as a revision surgery after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair has yet to be established. PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes, recurrences, and complication rates of arthroscopic Latarjet as a revision procedure after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair versus arthroscopic Latarjet as a primary procedure. DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients who were diagnosed with anterior shoulder instability and underwent arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization between 2009 and 2018. Patients were separated into 2 groups depending on whether Latarjet was performed after a previous instability surgery (revision) or as a primary surgery (primary). Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome (CMSO) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) were assessed pre- and postoperatively with a minimum 24 months of follow-up. In addition, pre- and postoperative levels of sports activity, dislocations, subluxations, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients (n = 62 revision; n = 35 primary), with a mean age of 31.0 ± 8.8 and 29.4 ± 7.6 years old in the revision and primary Latajet group, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up in the revision group was 32 months (24-53) and 35.5 months (27.7-42.2) in the primary Latarjet group. No significant differences between groups were observed in Rowe score (revision = 91.4, primary = 94.1; P = .223), CMSO score (revision = 90.7, primary = 94; P = .105), and SANE (revision = 85.8, primary = 87.3; P = .683) postoperatively. However, the postoperative difference in the WOSI score between the revision and primary Latarjet groups was nearly significant (510 ± 334 vs 403 ± 343, respectively; P = .05). Four (6.4%) postoperative dislocations were reported in the revision and 1 (2.8%) in the primary Latarjet group (P = .14). Patients in the revision group had a lower return to the previous level of sports participation (P = .008) and decreased external rotation with the arm by the side compared with the primary Latarjet group (P = .000). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic Latarjet as a revision surgery is a reasonable surgical option in failed Bankart repair cases. The decision to perform arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization as a revision surgery should not be influenced by the potential risk of future complications as it provides comparable clinical outcomes to the primary Latarjet procedure with a low postoperative recurrence rate. However, a decreased level of postoperative sports participation and external rotation with the arm by the side can be expected.

Shoulder reduction on the scene: current practice and outcome of the Bavarian Mountain Rescue Service-a prospective observational study.

Out-of-hospital reduction of shoulder dislocations using the Campell method is recommended by the International Commission for Alpine Rescue and applied in the Bavarian Mountain Rescue Service (Bergwacht Bayern, BWB) protocols. This prospective observational study includes patients out-of-hospital with suspected shoulder dislocation and treated and evacuated by the BWB. Data were systematically collected using three questionnaires: one completed on-site by the rescuer, the second in hospital by the physician and the third within 28 (8-143) days after the accident by the patient. The suspected diagnosis of shoulder dislocation was confirmed in hospital in 37 (84%) of 44 cases. Concomitant injuries in other body regions were found in eight (16%) of 49 cases and were associated with incorrect diagnosis (p = 0.002). Younger age (p = 0.043) and first shoulder dislocation event (p = 0.038) were associated with a higher success rate for reduction attempts. Out-of-hospital reduction of shoulder dislocations leads to significant pain relief and no poorer long-term outcome. Signs that are associated with successful out-of-hospital reduction (younger age and first event), but also those that are associated with incorrect diagnosis (concomitant injuries) should be considered before trying to reduce shoulder dislocation on site. The considerable rate of incorrect first diagnosis on site should give rise to an intensive discussion around teaching and training for this intervention.Trial registration: This study is registered with the German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRKS00023377).

Bilateral Posterior Fracture-Dislocation of the Shoulders Secondary to Uremic Encephalopathy.

Bilateral posterior fracture-dislocation of the shoulder is an uncommon injury pattern usually caused by epileptic seizures. The cause of the seizure activity remains unknown in most cases, although the injury has been associated with several conditions. A 59-year-old man with uncontrolled hypertension presented with new-onset generalized tonic-clonic seizures. He was diagnosed with uremic encephalopathy and bilateral posterior fracture-dislocation of his shoulders. His medical condition required stabilization leading to a delay in definitive surgery and a subsequent poor outcome. This case highlights the previously unknown association between bilateral fracture-dislocation of the shoulders and seizures caused by uremic encephalopathy. In these complex situations with competing clinical priorities, it is important to initiate prompt treatment of the cause in any new-onset seizures, to facilitate expedient surgical management of the orthopaedic injury.

Austere Diagnosis and Reduction of Anterior Shoulder Dislocations: 10-Year Review of a Ski Patrol-Based Program with Emergency Medical Technicians.

INTRODUCTION: Glenohumeral dislocations present a challenging management dilemma in austere settings where patient transport time may be prolonged. Expeditious reduction is preferable, but treatment is commonly expected to take place within a hospital or comparable facility. Through a novel shoulder injury program, professional ski patrollers trained as emergency medical technicians (EMTs) have diagnosed and reduced anterior shoulder dislocations using biomechanical techniques without sedation or analgesia for over 20 y. Summary records have been maintained to track the performance and safety of this program. METHODS: Five hundred forty-six records of winter sports-related shoulder injuries from 2009-10 to 2019-20 were retrospectively analyzed to determine the assessment performance and dislocation reduction efficacy of EMTs, with the intent of ascertaining whether EMT-trained practitioners can reliably and safely diagnose and reduce anterior shoulder dislocations without premedication in a remote and resource-limited setting. RESULTS: EMTs identified anterior shoulder dislocations with 98% sensitivity and 96% diagnostic accuracy. The overall success rate of reduction attempts was 86%, or 88% when limited to confirmed anterior dislocations. Two fracture-dislocations and 4 misdiagnoses were manipulated. No instances of iatrogenic harm were identified, and no patients who underwent successful reductions required ambulance transportation. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate education and within a structured program, EMT-trained practitioners can reliably and safely diagnose and reduce anterior shoulder dislocations using biomechanical techniques without premedication in remote and resource-limited environments. Implementation of similar programs in austere settings has the potential to improve patient care. Further, using biomechanical reduction techniques may reduce reliance on procedural sedation irrespective of care setting.

First-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: Approach for the primary health care physician.

Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation is a very common injury encountered in emergency rooms as well as in the primary health care physician's office. This injury occurs either in the setting of competitive or recreational sports injuries or as a high-energy injury during a fall or a road traffic accident. Common complications such as a recurrent dislocation can be predicted, monitored and prevented. Early appropriate treatment of associated cuff tears or fractures is associated with improved outcomes. There is a plethora of literature on the assessment and management of the primary anterior shoulder dislocation in specialised fields such as sports medicine, orthopaedic surgery and shoulder surgery. These studies are often highly technical, addressed to a particular subset of readers and often deal with one aspect of the management of the injury. This narrative aims to provide the reader with a simplified, evidence-based assessment and management approach for the first-time acute anterior shoulder dislocation. Emphasis is on closed reduction techniques, position and duration of immobilisation, and return to activities of life or sports. Risk factors for recurrence and other indications for primary referral to the orthopaedic surgeon are discussed. Other forms of shoulder instability such as posterior shoulder dislocation, inferior dislocation and multidirectional instability will not be the focus of this narrative.

[Research progress of the diagnosis and treatment of anterior shoulder instability].

The shoulder joint is the most prone to dislocation in the whole body, and more than 95% of them are anterior dislocation. Improper treatment after the initial dislocation is easy to lead to recurrent anterior dislocation or anterior shoulder instability, and the outcomes following conservative treatment is poor. Anterior shoulder instability can damage the soft tissue structure and bone structure that maintain the stability of shoulder joint, among which bone structure is the most important factor affecting the stability of shoulder joint. Diagnosis should be combined with medical history, physical examination, and auxiliary examination. Currently, three-dimensional CT is the most commonly used auxiliary examination means. However, various bone defect measurement and preoperative evaluation methods based on three-dimensional CT and the glenoid track theory have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is still a lack of gold standard. Currently, the mainstream treatment methods mainly include Bankart procedure, coracoid process transposition, glenoid reconstruction with free bone graft, Bankart combined with Remplissage procedure, and subscapular tendon binding tamponade, etc. Each of these procedures has its own advantages and disadvantages. For the diagnosis and treatment of anterior shoulder instability, there are still too many unknown, further research and exploration need to be studied.

Acute Shoulder Injuries in Adults.

Acute shoulder pain lasting less than six months is a common presentation to the primary care office. Shoulder injuries can involve any of the four shoulder joints, rotator cuff, neurovascular structures, clavicle or humerus fractures, and contiguous anatomy. Most acute shoulder injuries are the result of a fall or direct trauma in contact and collision sports. The most common shoulder pathologies seen in primary care are acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joint disease and rotator cuff injury. It is important to conduct a comprehensive history and physical examination to identify the mechanism of injury, localize the injury, and determine if surgical intervention is needed. Most patients with acute shoulder injuries can be treated conservatively using a sling for comfort and participating in a targeted musculoskeletal rehabilitation program. Surgery may be considered for treating middle third clavicle fractures and type III acromioclavicular sprains in active individuals, first-time glenohumeral dislocation in young athletes, and those with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Surgery is indicated for types IV, V, and VI acromioclavicular joint injuries or displaced or unstable proximal humerus fractures. Urgent surgical referral is indicated for posterior sternoclavicular dislocations.

At long-term follow-up many first-time male traumatic shoulder dislocators remain symptomatic.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the status at 13 to 17 years follow-up of a cohort of young male traumatic shoulder dislocators. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: A prospective study of first-time young male traumatic shoulder dislocators, began in 2004. Subjects were evaluated by the apprehension test after completing rehabilitation 6 to 9 weeks post dislocation. Between March 2021 and July 2022, a telephone questionnaire was administered to ascertain their current shoulder status. Subjects were questioned about avoidance of activities of daily living and sport, participation in sports, current instability, and self-assessed shoulder function by the SANE score. RESULTS: 50/53 (94.3%) of the study subjects, mean age 20.4 years, completed a mean follow-up of 181.8 ±â€¯12 months. The non-redislocation survival was 13% for those with a positive apprehension test and 49% for those with a negative test (p = 0.007). SANE scores were 64.3 ±â€¯23.7 for those with a positive apprehension test and 83.7 ±â€¯19.7 for those with a negative test (p = 0.001). In the year before the follow-up, 33.3% of those treated conservatively and 42.9% treated surgically experienced subluxation (p = 0.5). Fifty-seven percent of those who were treated conservatively and 56% of those who underwent surgery avoided some ADL or sports because of their shoulder. CONCLUSIONS: For young male first time traumatic shoulder dislocators a positive apprehension test after rehabilitation is associated with a high risk for reoccurrence and poorer long-term results. Most subjects were still dealing with shoulder symptoms at long-term follow-up.

High failure rate after conservative treatment for recurrent shoulder dislocation without subjective apprehension on physical examination.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of conservative treatment for recurrent shoulder dislocation without subjective apprehension, despite the presence of a Bankart lesion or glenoid defect. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for 92 patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation treated with conservative treatment due to negative apprehension between 2009 and 2018. The failure of the conservative treatment was defined as a dislocation or subluxation episode or subjective feeling of instability based on a positive apprehension. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate failure rates over time, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to determine a cut-off value for a glenoid defect. The clinical outcomes were compared between patients who completed conservative treatment without recurrence of instability (Group A) and those who failed and subsequently underwent surgical treatment (Group B) using shoulder functional scores and sports/recreation activity level. RESULTS: This retrospective study included 61 of 92 eligible patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation. Among the 61 patients, conservative treatment failed in 46 (75.4%) over the 2-year study period. The cut-off value for a glenoid defect was 14.4%. The association between glenoid defect size (≥ 14.4% or as a continuous variable) and survival was statistically significant (p = 0.039 and p < 0.001, respectively). The mean glenoid defect size in Group B increased from 14.6 ± 3.0% to 17.3 ± 3.1% (p < 0.001), and clinical outcomes for Group A were inferior to those for Group B at the 24-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment for recurrent shoulder dislocation in patients without subjective apprehension showed a high failure rate during the study period, especially if the glenoid defect was ≥ 14.4% in size. Despite clinical improvement in patients who completed conservative treatment without recurrence, functional outcome scores and sport/recreation activity levels were better in the patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. Therefore, for recurrent anterior shoulder instability, even without subjective apprehension, surgical treatment is warranted over conservative treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Postoperative MRI of Shoulder Instability.

Following anterior shoulder instability surgery, patients may present with new or recurrent symptoms. Postoperative imaging, including MR imaging, may be obtained for these patients to assess the integrity of the repaired tissues and orthopedic fixation hardware or grafts. Familiarity with different operative techniques and their expected normal appearances and complications helps in the appropriate interpretation of these imaging studies. This article provides an overview of the current treatment guidelines and surgery options for patients with anterior shoulder instability and reviews the normal and abnormal postoperative imaging appearances of the shoulder joint after treatment with the most common surgical stabilization techniques.

[Bilateral posterior shoulder dislocation with associated reverse Hill-Sachs lesions after electrical injury].

After workers suffer electric shock, the ankylosis and contraction of muscle groups around the shoulder joint are more likely to lead to posterior dislocation and fracture, of which 80% are complicated with reverse Hill-Sachs injury of humeral head. This paper reports a case of bilateral posterior dislocation of shoulder joint combined with Hill-Sachs injury caused by electric shock in the Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Huzhou Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine in August 2020. The diagnosis of left posterior shoulder dislocation was clear, and the diagnosis of right posterior shoulder dislocation was missed. The patient successfully reconstructed the stability of the shoulder joint by actively performing shoulder arthroscopic surgery to repair the joint capsule. After 6 months of follow-up, there was no further dislocation and the function was good.

Clinical Evaluation and Instrumental Diagnostics in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to improve the diagnosis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation by studying the capabilities and characteristics of clinical and instrumental diagnostic methods. The idea is expressed that modern clinical and instrumental diagnostic methods comprise a large number of techniques, but no single algorithm for diagnosing injury to the AC joint has been developed. A gold standard for investigating and diagnosing acute AC joint dislocation does not currently exist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of the characteristics and capabilities of clinical and instrumental diagnostic methods was performed in 152 patients with traumatic shoulder pathology. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I of 102 patients (67%) with acromioclavicular joint dislocation type III-VI according to Rockwood classification and Group II of 50 patients (33%) with a partial tear of the rotator cuff. Clinical and instrumental examinations involved specific provocative tests; the radiological diagnostics comprised conventional radiographs with the Zanca, axillary and Alexander views, and CT, MRI, and ultrasound examinations. RESULTS: The characterization of examination methods was based on the records of patients in Group I and II. The most sensitive clinical test to establish Rockwood type V of acromioclavicular joint dislocation was the Paxinos test (91%). The lowest sensitivity across the tests used was observed with the active compression test to diagnose type IV of dislocation (50%). As regards the X-ray examination, the axial view was 100% sensitive for detecting type IV and VI AC joint dislocation. The Zanca view is highly sensitive for patients with Rockwood type V and Alexander view for Rockwood type III and V dislocations. The accuracy of ultrasound work-up in Group I was 95%, with 96% sensitivity and 93% specificity, while MRI accuracy was 97%, with 96% sensitivity and 98% specificity, and CT accuracy was 81%, with 83% sensitivity and 75% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the X-ray examination revealed the absence of a 100% effective X-ray view for type III and V AC joint dislocation. 2. The accuracy and sensitivity of the ultrasound, MRI, and CT examinations are high. 3. There is currently no consensus on a protocol to view acute AC joint injuries. 4. Complete and timely early diagnosis of acromioclavicular dislocation allows for a diffe-rentiated approach to surgical treatment tactics, preventing possible complications and restoring the function of the injured shoulder joint to the fullest extent.

Early reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations in a ski field setting.

OBJECTIVE: The present study describes the management of suspected shoulder dislocations in ski field clinics. METHODS: Data were collected from two clinics in Queenstown, New Zealand. Suspected anterior shoulder dislocations, with no suspicion of significant fractures and without imaging, underwent attempted reduction. RESULTS: Ninety percent (n = 49) of dislocations were successfully relocated. No short-term complications because of this procedure were observed. CONCLUSION: This short report raises the possibility that early anterior shoulder reduction in a ski field clinic can be safe without imaging, in select cases. Prospective studies including patient centred data are recommended.

[Posterior Dislocation of the Shoulder with Compression Fracture of the Humeral Head. Our Experience with McLaughlin Procedure and Its Modification]. / Zadní glenohumerální luxace s impresní zlomeninou hlavice. Nase zkusenosti s operací dle McLaughlina a její modifikací.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study is to remind of the specific features of diagnosis and therapy of dorsal dislocations of the glenohumeral joint to prevent frequent neglect or misdiagnosis during primary treatment. Also, we strived to present our experience and outcomes of posterior dislocation treatment by McLaughlin procedure and its modified version. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 7 patients who had been treated at our department in the period 2015-2019 by McLaughlin procedure or its modification. The group consisted of 5 men and 2 women aged 33-79 years. In five patients, the dislocation occurred during an epileptic seizure, in two patients during an accident. The patients were treated by McLaughlin procedure or the Neer modification of McLaughlin procedure. The deltoideopectoral surgical approach was always used. Based on the preoperative planning, we decided, or intraoperatively changed our decision, as to whether mere transposition of the subscapularis is satisfactory or whether transposition of the lesser tuberosity to the defect, a bone graft and arthroplasty are necessary. Postoperatively, the operated limb was fixed for 6 weeks in neutral position, which was followed by rehabilitation. RESULTS We evaluated subjective and objective outcomes of the surgery, the radiological finding and in 2 patients also a control CT scan. The function of the shoulder was assessed using the Constant shoulder score and the OSIS scoring system. The resulting score: the mean OSIS was 55.7 points (92.8%) and the mean Constant score was 86.2 points (86.2%), which we regard as a very good result. All patients consider the surgery successful and are satisfied with the outcome. No patient reported recurrent dislocation. DISCUSSION When treating the posterior dislocation of the shoulder, vital is the shoulder reducibility and also the presence or the size of reverse Hill-Sachs defect. The transfer of the subscapularis tendon can be performed as an open procedure or arthroscopically. Inveterate irreducible posterior dislocation of the shoulder is quite a rare diagnosis, which is why even at our department the McLauglin procedure is performed in the order of units per year only. CONCLUSIONS The surgical solution of inveterate posterior dislocation of the shoulder is hardly ever uncomplicated. The reduction alone is often insufficient and some other way of shoulder stabilisation is necessary, often times addressing the humeral head defect. In our to date experience, the McLaughlin procedure or the Neer s modification is an elegant and safe method to treat posterior dislocation with a humeral head defect. The functional outcomes are very good and enable the patients to reengage in everyday activities. Thanks to this procedure shoulder joint arthroplasty can be avoided in younger patients. Nonetheless, in defects that are greater than 50% of the head the replacement is necessary. Due to frequently associated rotator cuff injuries, the most often procedure indicated by us is the reverse total shoulder replacement. Key words: posterior dislocation of the shoulder, reverse Hill-Sachs defect, McLaughlin procedure, Neer s modification.

Comprehensive Review of Shoulder Instability Includes Diagnosis, Nonoperative Management, Bankart, Latarjet, Remplissage, Glenoid Bone-Grafting, Revision Surgery, Rehabilitation and Return to Play, and Clinical Follow-Up.

The Delphi method is a structured communication technique used to allow a panel of experts to achieve a consensus in a systematic manner. Expert consensus on shoulder instability includes review of diagnosis, nonoperative management, Bankart, Latarjet, remplissage, glenoid bone-grafting, revision surgery, rehabilitation and return to play, and clinical follow-up. Amplified by Editorial Commentary, this is much to study, clinically relevant, and to the ultimate benefit of our patients.

Editorial Commentary: A Consensus of Experts Complements the Clinical Evidence on Diagnosis and Treatment of Anterior Glenohumeral Instability.

The current diagnostic and treatment strategies for anterior glenohumeral instability have been refined by high-quality clinical and basic science studies, but many controversies remain. These include the bone loss threshold for arthroscopic Bankart repair and the influence of other clinical factors on this decision, the optimal bracing position following anterior glenohumeral dislocation, and the optimal coracoid graft orientation during the Latarjet procedure. Randomized clinical trials often present conflicting results, and many of these are small-sample and fragile studies. Obtaining an expert consensus on the topic, by means of the Delphi method, is an attractive alternative to such clinical trials. Several studies employing variations of the Delphi method have addressed the diagnosis and treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability. These have stressed the importance of a meticulous technique during arthroscopic Bankart repair and of recognition of glenoid and humeral bone loss and treating this appropriately. These studies have also helped identify areas where consensus is modest or lacking to motivate additional clinical research study.

Evaluation and Management of the Contact Athlete's Shoulder.

Shoulder injuries are common in contact athletes and vary in severity because of the required complex interplay of shoulder stability and range of motion for proper function. Pathology varies based on sport but most commonly includes shoulder instability, acromioclavicular injuries, traumatic rotator cuff tears, and brachial plexus injuries. Acute management ranges from reduction of shoulder dislocations to physical examination to determine the severity of injury. Appropriate radiographs should be obtained to evaluate for alignment and fracture, with magnetic resonance imaging commonly being necessary for accurate diagnosis and management. Treatments range from surgical stabilization in shoulder instability to repeat examinations and physical therapy. Return-to-play decision making can be complex with avoidance of reinjury and player safety being of utmost concern. Appropriate evaluation and treatment are vital because repeat injury can lead to long-term effects due to the relatively high effectsometimes seen in contact sports.